joyami Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Natalie lies so much, it's hard to believe her. She is like the little boy who cried wolf. Maybe it is true but we can't believe her. It's just too fishy for me to digest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatcat Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I can't believe how gulliable these ppl in the house are if they go for all the bs Nasty says, after sooo much you gotta be gettin a little bull shit radar goin, I know I would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pianoforte Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Especially the lack of a real ring. It's not like he's also in the BB house. And even if he were a poor man, he would be able to get something better than a twist tie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laladoopiedu Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I believe her. If it's all a lie, then I got got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misha Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Misha just from chattin here with you at Morty's we know you are not the scum of the earth like Natalie, some ppl you just get a feel for, this is who she is, it is not just lyin, she takes it tooo far for it not to be her own true self, there is a difference in game and just bein a true di*k head.JMHO Thank you Fatcat. And I don't think Natalie and I would ever be friends outside the BB house. But I also don't like demonizing someone and crediting them with only evil things. I couldn't stand Jerry last year and I wanted him evicted, and I couldn't stand ED towards the end of his season either; however, I think sometimes the hating goes too far. I didn't believe the initial story, but I do believe her boyfriend was in the room with her. I do believe he also proposed to her. I know that we will see things on Sunday (or Tuesday), but still... some of the scenarios and initial reactions just bug the heck out of me. Is she selfish? Absolutely. Does she have an overblown sense of entitlement? Absolutely. Does she have the extremely irritating personality trait that she ALWAYS has to be right and ALWAYS has to win? Yes. Will she cheat or lie to do it? Yep. So I'm not in denial about her at all. I just think its a waste of time for me to hate on a houseguest this much. Jeff was a dumbass in his moves. He got eliminated for it. I also hated how he talked to Jordan. But he's probably a nice guy MOST of the time. Natalie isn't as nice as Jeff is, but she's not all evil either. Its just my opinion. I know it, I accept it. For some reason, I feel like defending her because of the mass amounts of animosity aimed towards her. Will I change anybody's mind? Nope. But maybe her family/friends will see these posts of mine and see that there are people in the world who don't despise her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uvp Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 not playing in pov is probably true no feeds so i am going by what i read here about what she said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatcat Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 AND, why in the world would someone who supposedly loves you enough to propose and wants to do it in style, like on tv, would they do it where noone could see it occur???? Hello, I call bull shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laladoopiedu Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 not playing in pov is probably true no feeds so i am going by what i read here about what she said Cancel them already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 AND, why in the world would someone who supposedly loves you enough to propose and wants to do it in style, like on tv, would they do it where noone could see it occur???? Hello, I call bull shit Proposing on TV would not be in style IMO and the girls I know would think it kinda redneck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranjake Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I believe her. If it's all a lie, then I got got. the 'boyfriend' is currently having some eviction difficulties in arizona-so i find it odd he'd jet in for a quick proposal. and her dad and boyf shopping for her brand 'delmonte'? like hannibel lecter said 'desperately random, like the delusions of a bad liar.' i don't believe the gnat- i think she took$ and forfeited pov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uvp Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Cancel them already? yeah blame jeff n jordan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smassadi Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Did she tell anyone that? No Sucks found a commercial saying jury members will visit so they pieced it all together. They know it is NOT her boyfriend. We will be seeing a commercial on TV that says "the jury house will be the one to pack the punch in the mystery room" She gave up the VETO to talk to a jury member. In fact her boyfriend has been online recently and is not in LA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joyami Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 No Sucks found a commercial saying jury members will visit so they pieced it all together. They know it is NOT her boyfriend. We will be seeing a commercial on TV that says "the jury house will be the one to pack the punch in the mystery room" She gave up the VETO to talk to a jury member. In fact her boyfriend has been online recently and is not in LA. If she lies on tv about her boyfriend proposing to her and being there and he wasn't, couldn't he have a law suit with BB?? I would think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 sorry, but w/ all due respect, i don't 'gotta' give her credit for anything other than being queen of stench and boogers. Michele just asked the DR for a party to celebrate Nat's engagement and they said "we'll consider it". Wonder what that BF is thinking and what he got himself into Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misha Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I think I'm going to call it a night on the boards. Good night everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 It wasn't money. she got to talk to jury members who were in costumes in exchange for giving up VETO. She got angry because they sprayed her face with water "bug spray" and didn't give her any info. She is angry and making up a lie so they don't know she saw the jury and got shafted. What ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smassadi Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Good Night! Funny about suing people were wondering why she was not called out when she was talking about production! Maybe BBAD WILL be worth it tonight! What ? The commercial is supposedly going to be shown primetime tomorrow on CBS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Good Night! Funny about suing people were wondering why she was not called out when she was talking about production! Maybe BBAD WILL be worth it tonight! The commercial is supposedly going to be shown primetime tomorrow on CBS Thanks . So Nat is pulling a prank telling the HG she was proposed to, not CBS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitsy Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I don't know what happened...but I would bet that Gnat is lying. She "possibly" may have given up the veto, but not to see her BF IMO...or like someone else said..got money. IF her BF had really been there to propose, he would have had a REAL RING to give her..not a "twist-tie" Good grief, I don't believe anything Gnat says anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joyami Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Big Brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 So Nat definitely cannot play for POV ? That is good news . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Nat doesn't need to play. Both Michele and Jordan are after Kevin. Now if Kevin wins then Michele leaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitsy Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 One thing for sure SHE wasn't giving up anything by giving up Veto (if she did). She still is Final 3... I love BB but do not like "players" (using the word loosely) like Gnat. I would think by now Kevin would have aligned with anyone but her...but that is just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Nat doesn't need to play. Both Michele and Jordan are after Kevin. Now if Kevin wins then Michele leaves. Good point but if either Nat or Kevin won POV they would get rid of Michelle right ? So that helps her odds if Nat cannot get POV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Yes it is good for Michele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.