laladoopiedu Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 So, does it seem that Julie hinted that a jury member may be going back into the house at some point? I can't believe this would even be a possibility after the bad reviews BB Canada received for doing this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uvp Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 that was my fear bb would mimic bbcanadai hate when they bring evicted players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laladoopiedu Posted August 9, 2013 Author Share Posted August 9, 2013 And not just an evicted player, but an evicted player who's sequestered with other players and can talk about anything. That's a huge advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawknose Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 And not just an evicted player, but an evicted player who's sequestered with other players and can talk about anything. That's a huge advantage.They hinted at it, but they didn't tell the evicted HG's about it so I don't know - if they do it like Canada did it I swear I won't watch the rest of the season - the only way to do it right is the way they did in season 9 where they were all sequestered separately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slimcruz Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 She did hint at something. It seemed that she hinted more pointedly to candice and didn't elaborate after that.How did canada do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawknose Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 She did hint at something. It seemed that she hinted more pointedly to candice and didn't elaborate after that.How did canada do it?It was awful - each evicted HG went to the jury house and reported everything to the other evicted HG's - then Canada voted one back in to the house with all the previously evicted HG's knowledge of events - it was a huge unfair advantage - in other words they were all sequestered together Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrinra Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle, then when there were five people left Canada voted one person back into the game. He had a chance to get information and solidify bonds with the jury members which helped him. He also manipulated HG's by telling them that they were loved in the jury and would win. He would have won too, if Topaz hadn't voted for the wrong person to win (still laughing about that btw). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntiBrenchelArmy Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Bringing players back before jury starts is always more exciting Although I hated that the last time it was done (because Brendon came back), it was worth it when Lawon threw himself out of the game so early XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawknose Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Bringing players back before jury starts is always more exciting Although I hated that the last time it was done (because Brendon came back), it was worth it when Lawon threw himself out of the game so early XDLol I'll never forget how he thought he was getting super powers I still laugh every time I hear his name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slimcruz Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Okay. Thanks all. I remember reading that there was some controversy over the BB canada winner. Now I understand. I kind of thought when julie chen said it to candice tonight that candice was a bit taken aback for a moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerberadaisy7 Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 It was awful - each evicted HG went to the jury house and reported everything to the other evicted HG's - then Canada voted one back in to the house with all the previously evicted HG's knowledge of events - it was a huge unfair advantage - in other words they were all sequestered togetherYes this is exactly what happened. The returning HG played it up - lying of course - and completly affected the game. He almost won too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerberadaisy7 Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle, then when there were five people left Canada voted one person back into the game. He had a chance to get information and solidify bonds with the jury members which helped him. He also manipulated HG's by telling them that they were loved in the jury and would win. He would have won too, if Topaz hadn't voted for the wrong person to win (still laughing about that btw). This makes it sound like everyone evicted went and hung out. No, there was a sequestered jury, just like BBUS. There was a select jury of 7 and he got voted back in (the choice was other evicted HG's of the jury - like the US show - he was the clear fan favourite and the only reason this was even happening!)He was fairly evicted. OMG! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrinra Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 This makes it sound like everyone evicted went and hung out. No, there was a sequestered jury, just like BBUS. There was a select jury of 7 and he got voted back in (the choice was other evicted HG's of the jury - like the US show - he was the clear fan favourite and the only reason this was even happening!)He was fairly evicted. OMG!Yes, I am well aware of all of this and I thought I made it clear in my post that all of the evicted HG's went to the jury house and mingled with one another. They DID go and hang out...the jury members in the jury house that is. I never said it wasn't sequestered. I don't see how I was misleading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerberadaisy7 Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Yes, I am well aware of all of this and I thought I made it clear in my post that all of the evicted HG's went to the jury house and mingled with one another. They DID go and hang out...the jury members in the jury house that is. I never said it wasn't sequestered. I don't see how I was misleading."Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle"That was a tad misleading to me. I was going to explain myself, but actually, the sentence doesn't make sense.I guess all of the evicted HG's got to mingle with each other and be jury? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyse Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 I kinda want them to compare notes about folks still in the house then allowed back in, however I would like them to compete for the 2nd chance. Please keep America out of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrinra Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 "Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle"That was a tad misleading to me. I was going to explain myself, but actually, the sentence doesn't make sense.I guess all of the evicted HG's got to mingle with each other and be jury?Uh...yes. BB Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to the jury house and mingle, meaning swap information and gain information they otherwise wouldn't have known (if they had been sequestered away from one another). So I meant it was unfair. If they were going to bring back a jury member they should have sequestered them all separately. That's what I was trying to explain. I still don't see how I was misleading. I'm sorry if I was though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerberadaisy7 Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Uh...yes. BB Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to the jury house and mingle, meaning swap information and gain information they otherwise wouldn't have known (if they had been sequestered away from one another). So I meant it was unfair. If they were going to bring back a jury member they should have sequestered them all separately. That's what I was trying to explain. I still don't see how I was misleading. I'm sorry if I was though.You rock. I SUCK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tritledee Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 I just wonder if Candice and Ginamarie will actually come to blows when Ginamarie gets to the jury house. They should really be kept separated. The hatred between them is just too strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drummer1 Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Julie Chen kept saying over and over that since they are now going to jury that she would not be able to talk to the houseguests about all of the media attention that they have received regarding racism and child pornography. That means that they are going to be bombarded with this for the first time in the interview line in the backyard on finale night.Do you think that they will limit who gets in from the press to question them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janis Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Julie Chen kept saying over and over that since they are now going to jury that she would not be able to talk to the houseguests about all of the media attention that they have received regarding racism and child pornography. That means that they are going to be bombarded with this for the first time in the interview line in the backyard on finale night. Do you think that they will limit who gets in from the press to question them? In my opinion they never ask the houseguests anything relevent. They are always sugar coated. I will bet that Aaryn, Spencer, Gina Marie and Amanda will be notified about the situation before they are even interviewed. I would not be surprised if they did not do any interviews, Aaryn's pr person I am sure will not want her opening her mouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brekkie Boy Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 They hinted at it but it'll likely be far earlier than Canada did it, not with just 4 or 5 left in the house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 6Borders Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 I still maintain my opinion that this is just a safety net to bring Amanda back in if she gets evicted in the next week/weeks, until such time as they can't bring her back because it's too deep into the show (at which time I am sure there would be every other safety net possible for her).If BB is going to do as Canada did, the only reasons I can see for it is #1-to get Amanda back in and #2 it costs a lot LESS money to send them to Jury a few miles away, where all they have is each other to compare notes, vs. the old BB's in which they went home, watched the shows and compared notes with friends, family and the internet and BB had to incur the costs of flying them all back out to LA for finale.I personally think if you are going to do this just send them ALL to jury and have 13-14 people voting for 2 or 3 on the block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janis Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 That was the one thing I did not like about Canada's big brother because once in jury no one is there to tell you what you can and cannot talk about. I thought it gave Gary a huge advantage in the game when he returned. As far as Amanda goes I don't think Grodner could get away with bringing her back when America has voted her on the block for 2 straight weeks. I am assuming that it would either be America's vote or a competition to decide who comes back. I would prefer a competition that we would get to watch. Who knows but if they are going to bring someone back I would hope they do it soon and not like Canada and wait until the final 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 6Borders Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 As far as Amanda goes I don't think Grodner could get away with bringing her back when America has voted her on the block for 2 straight weeks. I am assuming that it would either be America's vote or a competition to decide who comes back. I would prefer a competition that we would get to watch. Who knows but if they are going to bring someone back I would hope they do it soon and not like Canada and wait until the final 4.Grodner will do anything she wants to do. She doesn't care that America voted Amanda on the block twice, and it makes it more attractive because the chats will be buzzing if Amanda is evicted and returned (Hollyweird Mantra: doesn't matter what they are saying as long as they are talking about you = ratings = money!)That would be a whole show to watch all the jurors compete with each other to get back in the house...probably something the HG's would be sitting in the living room watching and cheering for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splinter2424 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 That would be a whole show to watch all the jurors compete with each other to get back in the house...probably something the HG's would be sitting in the living room watching and cheering for. I vote we just bring back this whole cast next year and do BB16 - the Hunger Games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.