mingers Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 I don't know...if it came down to Dick versus Danielle, do you think she'd vote Danielle? She hates that woman and has trashed her character in every post interview even more than "Richard's" deplorable behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carmen Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Yeah, that'll be a tough one if both the dick-heads make it to the final 2. I know she hates Danielle, but when push comes to shove I think Jen would end up voting for Danielle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumblonde Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Uhhhh how did Jen's shirt get "destroyed" ? Eric put mustard on the shirt & the mustard washed right out of the widdle bitty shirt. wah wah amen oh wicked one p.s... I hope Jen sticks around for the jury too so Dick can have another crack at her psychotic self Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fizzle Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 i wonder if eric will take mustard with him to the finale. yeah, its dead.... i have the proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumblonde Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Ooooh I hope so mustard at the finale would makey for a good finale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Hey Dick's son, eric was TOLD to destroy someone's stuff. This isn't Dick's son Vincent... This guy said his real name is Tony... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveDaniele Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Are you joking???? Her eating was NOT fair. Alot of them were on slop and she just decides the heck with everyong else and just eats regular food. Breaking the rules is not fair Now personally I admit that having Eric destroy something of Jen's was bad....but destroying Dick's cigarettes was bad too. And Jen burned herself on that thing. -Kyo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jem Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 The biggest problem the HGs had with her eating was she gave up the food to WIN the Veto that sent another person home. It wasn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thequeenjoni Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 And Jen burned herself on that thing EXACTLY....she burned HERSELF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumblonde Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 OK but I gotta say the use of the word "destroy" is out of whack... squirting mustard on a shirt which is then washed & found to be 100% mustard-free after the wash is not destroying. MBE it could be considered assault & battery on a shirt, I dunno Breaking ciggys into little pieces & then pouring bleach on them is destruction. There is no way to glue the ciggys back together & then unbleach them. The act cannot be undone so that act is actually considered destruction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Um...the HGs were upset that Jen violated 8 seasons of honoring a standard Big Brother rule (i.e. not eating food when you are on slop), not that she destroyed the cigarettes. No one but Dick cared about that. Oh please these idiots break the rules everyday by singing and talking about DR sessions. If you are going to inforce one rule inforce them all Integrity of BB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chichi Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 ^^^^ Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jem Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Maybe they should have taken back the veto she won and put Kail back in the house. I think it's a little different from singing or mentioning a DR session. She won that Veto because she agreed to eat slop for the same amount of time as Kail (30 days), if she wasn't willing to do it Kail could have won, taken herself off the block and stayed that week. Amber: "Let's reveal the next one. 'Sloppy Summer.' Over the next 30 days, how many hours are you willing to eat nothing but slop?" In this round, Zach was eliminated. Kail and Jen will be eating slop for 720 hours. http://www.mortystv.com/archive/bb8/bb8_34.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 rules are rules And if BB is going to change rules (Letting someone destroy her property, and scold her for doing the same) Then she doesnt need to follow their stinking rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jem Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 She didn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumblonde Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 I am still trying to figure out what property of Jen's was actually destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Where did i say she got a Penalty for that i said and scold her for doing the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jem Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Her shirt? The one that Eric put mustard on because the producers told him too? The one that washed out and she has at the sequester house with her? Oh ok, my mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thequeenjoni Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Talker: How is Eric to be "scolded" if "supposedly" no one knows who did the mustard deal ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 How is Eric to be "scolded" if "supposedly" no one knows who did the mustard deal ? How are they going to instruct one player to vandalize someone's personal property and then scold another for doing the same? what is the title of this thread again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bb8viewer Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 This whole idea of America Player is the biggest blunder in reality TV history. Intentionally or not, with the AP, a rule has effectively been made to give some players (so called "popular" players such as Dick/Dani) absolute advantage over other players. Yet, BB producers often talk about fairness and integrity of the game, that's a big joke!!! It's so shameful to talk about integrity of the game when making the rule of game favoring some players over others. Here is how the advantage works: when Eric himself gets hoh, he simply has to or is paid to help the "popular" players (such as Dick/Dani) and nominate their enemies, when someone else gets hoh, he is paid to persuade to the hoh to nominate and obligated to vote out Dick/Dani's enemy.If you are still not sure what I am talking about, just take a look at the next week scenario which will be a good example: assuming Jess will be voted out on this coming Thursday, then there are only Dick, Dani and Eric available to play for hoh. But even if Eric wins the next hoh, no matter how he feels emotionally (about Jess's out), or think strategically what should be done next, he can't nominate or vote out Dick/Dani because he (as AP) is simply not allowed to do so. So Dick/Dani will be in final 3 no matter what happen!!! What a "fair" rule BB producers have made!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catniptoy Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Actually, since it's a fast-forward eviction this week, the person who wins HOH will have to stand up and immediately say who he/she is nominating. Therefore, Eric should be able to nominate Dick and Daniele. It's the only week he will be able to make two nominations of his own choosing, if I understand it correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boobeans Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Yeah, if Eric wins HOH, or whoever, that person will have, if it's done like last year, about 4 min. to nom. So it is possible that at least 1 of the Donatos will be on the block. IF Eric wins HOH. I do agree that the AP this year has given unfair advantage to the popular players. Could be that I'll finally, after 8 seasons, see someone I've been rooting for win. Edited to add: Or at least a final 2 that I can stomach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jersey721 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Actually, since it's a fast-forward eviction this week, the person who wins HOH will have to stand up and immediately say who he/she is nominating. Therefore, Eric should be able to nominate Dick and Daniele. It's the only week he will be able to make two nominations of his own choosing, if I understand it correctly. You're absolutely right. I hope he does win HOH this week so he can actually play for himself for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelegyrl Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 my two cents: I don't think Jen was scolded at all for the cigarette incident. I think she actually go permission to do it. Big Brother did, however, replace the cigarettes. Her penalty vote was for blatantly breaking a Big Brother rule that is posted in the rule book. As for the Double eviction, i'm assuming if Eric wins HOH he'll be able to put up whoever he wants since America has no time to vote. Should be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.