JEDI

LOL Joke's on you! (I went and changed the topic titles. WTH, these twins are interchangeable, right?)

Many players realize exactly that. When you have 2 targets, and don't put both of them up, if the other one gets picked to play Veto, then WINS veto, both your targets will be safe. The problem is, that with this many people still in the house, the chances that your second target will both firstly get picked to play in Veto, and secondly come through with the win, are extremely low, so most decide that playing it safe by not showing their cards and nominating their true target, is worth the risk, since it has such a low probability. It's not the most logical thing to do, but the risk/cost ratio is determined by them to be worth the effort at subterfuge. Being bold like James was this past week, and just straightforwardly throwing up your two main targets is the best strategy to accomplish your goal of getting at LEAST one of them out.

Now that the halfway point of the game has been passed, and everyone left is guaranteed at least Jury, will Meg step up her game, or continue to appear harmless and float her way to the final pawn position? No one knows for sure.

Will Liz survive the week without going on the block? Only time will tell.

Will Julia survive the week without going on the block? Only time will tell.

I'm not sure how to help you. The email address you supplied is linked to the account "Granny0214", which was last used on July 7, 2013, so 2 years ago, not last year, and which was originally created in August of 2010. So if you used a different account last year, I don't know which one it was. I can change the password for you, if need be, but it may be the same one you've used on this newly-created account you posted from. Please advise, either by posting here, or via private message.

Having officially entered the house as her own person, she deserved her own individual topic.

Our updaters are just making a note of the time and screen the particularly interesting action they are describing took place. That way, anyone who would like to see it for themselves can easily find it.

Although he's not viewed as a physical threat, will his mental abilities land him on the block, or can he remain off people's radar?

Will Jeff and Jackie's TAR connection forever be a reason they'll be seen as a couple, or have they convinced everyone that they are playing this game solo? I guess only time will tell.

Is Becky playing a great game, or just being a floater?

James. Where does James' fate lie this week?

Shelli was HoH last week, and her reign went well. There should be no one coming after her for any blood on her hands. Now, did she do enough on the social level to remain a non-threat, and thus not a target? After all, 4 people have to go on the block every week.

All they have to do is "survive" the first 5 evictions, and they can both enter the game. Even though certain houseguests are onto their ruse, are they going to try to work WITH them, or AGAINST them, and are they aware of the "5 eviction" clause? Only time will tell, and it should be fun finding out.

The twins were shown on the live show, casting their vote to evict Jase together. At that point, they had already switched 4 times, so their swith on the live show was the 5th.

Jason was nominated along with Steve, by Becky, but they won the Battle of the Block, and their safety.

Shelli won the second round of the HoH competition to become the second Head of Household for Week 2.

Vanessa has told people she used to be a poker player. It doesn't seem to have made her any more of a target.

Meg continues to do what Meg does best.

Becky won the first round of the HoH competition to become the first Head of Household of Week 2. When her nominees Steve and Jason won the Battle of the Block, she was dethroned.

From what I had read, Vanessa and Da'Vonne, as well as the two they chose for safety this week (Austin and Liz), were made Have-Nots. I thought it might be a condition of their safety, but it could also have been the reason they were chosen as Have-Nots by someone, and I was waiting to see that go down on the show for an explanation, but didn't see anything. Anyone watching just the episodes would not even be aware that there were any Have-Nots this week!

Yes, "faux" means fake or false, in French. So in-faux-mation as a play on words would mean false information. OR, if it's Jason saying it, that would just be him saying "information" in his accent. LOL

Apologies for the spoilers in the thread titles. Honestly, without them, you'd still get spoiled by reading the threads, since every time something big happens (comp win, noms, nom changes) it ends up getting posted about, being a great subject for discussion. So, I'm afraid anyone not wanting to see spoilers would have to be very careful, or only visit between evictions and nominations (if who wins HoH is shown on the show). Ultimately, just knowing who wins Veto does not make me want to watch how they won any less. Some people just don't have the time. (Or they can't get them due to not residing in the USofA.)

Several times. (Every few days.)

Thanks for bringing this to Morty's attention. It might be little while before it's fixed, though. The underlining is not there to denote nominations, but is actually just a visible spell-check feature. (Morty's eyesight must be getting EVEN worse with old age!)