I'm sorry but I don't agree with you. Why is it that "winning contests" is better than "out smarting people"? To me, they are both equal. If only people who are athletic/smart "deserve" to win Big Brother, than they should cast nothing but jocks. Since it's not a cast of nothing but jocks, people have to use what they have. I've said this 1,000 times and I'll keep saying it.... Every single person who goes into the GAME of Big Brother or Survivor has their own "Rule Book" in their head of how the game should be played. And when the rest of the group doesn't play by those "rules", they are "wrong". Well, what if my rule book and your rule book aren't the same? Why does your rule book take precedent over mine? The reason? You are trying to win. Well, so am I (speaking as a contestant). But I'm not here to help YOUR game, I'm here to help my own game and get to the end. (once again, speaking as a contestant). IMO, any person who makes it to the final two, no matter how they got there, deserves to be there. In Hayden's season, that final three definitely didn't ride coat tails. And even though I didn't like how they played the game, they still did better than everyone else using the strategy they had and he won. The one thing I can't stand on Big Brother (or any other reality competition show), is the finger pointing, meaning accusing people of doing things that they have done themselves. It's that whole, "it's okay if I cheat and lie, but don't you dare lie and cheat to me!"