Guest Lexia Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Sorry I missed earlier post... who did maggie NOM and has POV been done yet? I thought I saw a post where Maggie NOM Janelle and James, was I seeing things?(sorry if repeat post) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 She nominated James and Kaysar... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hashman Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 POV comp to start any minute now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lexia Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 thanks guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest princessmean1 Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 your welcome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SthnCmft Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 ...the Food Competition on Real Player but not the Veto Comp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aladybug824 Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 IMO, it's because there is no epsidoe devoted to the food comp, its just an afterthought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 They have to save something for the show... That would give away things they want to keep secret until the show... Although it never happens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Janelle is talking to Kaysar and she said she wished they hadn't change the thing where some veto's couldn't be used (won)...Maybe they took that little tidbit out and haven't told us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tillgurl Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 When exactly did Julie tell us some weeks there would be no veto?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 First show... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerSnaps Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Julie said there would be a time when a veto couldn't be won. Did she mean there would be no veto comp that week or the comp could result in a no win. Does anyone know this?Go Kaysar. You rock my world! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dancingfool Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 My impression was that on some veto comps it was POSSIBLE if noone completed the competition that no PoV would be won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerSnaps Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 My impression was that on some veto comps it was POSSIBLE if noone completed the competition that no PoV would be won.Thank you.Go Kaysar. You rock my world! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yana Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 But from what Janelle was saying they have changed that... She was saying it was too bad they had changed it and this wasn't one of those weeks cause then maybe James' would be leaving not Kaysar... Side note... Kaysar asked Janelle if she would leave the house for him and she asked him what he would do for her... He said something along the lines of I will make it worth your while... She said the same thing you and Mike talked about... He paused then said yeah... She said really? He said yeah... Then said I'm not even sure I want to stay, I was just thinking... He might be trying to work it so he stays... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Witness Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 They misunderstood what Julie said. Julie said this year, there will be competitions that possibly won't be won. An example is the chess game. If Kaysar & Co hadn't worked with James, it would have been possible that at the end of the round neither of the last 2 players would have been able to make a move, thus, no winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaLady Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 If this has been asked in the past, please don't flog me. LOLI have watched BB every season, and I also have the live feeds. Maybe the HG have this in their "rules" before entering the house, but I have never heard it mentioned. My question is this. Say for instance that James and Kaysar are on the block. They play for the Veto and James wins it. Has it ever been suggested that James use the Veto to save Kaysar, thus saving himself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ranster627 Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 At this point the question is moot as Sarah used it and saved James ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebartist Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 I am not sure how that would save himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Devoncroix Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 Actually I have wondered this myself... because the person using the veto can not be put up for eviction. However I would imagine that it doesn't remove the user either. It does seem to be a weird loophole though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest raceingal11 Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 the POV only protects the user from being put up in the place of the person removed. it does not give immunity to a houseguest who is already on the block - i/e/ if james had won and used it to save kasar, it would NOT remove them both from the block, and would not have prevented james from being evicted. but, as has already happened - sarah won and removed james. it DOES prevent HER from being put up in james' place. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serena Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 There is no 'loophole' if you are nominated and win veto and take of the other nominee, you are still nominated because you didn't change your own status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaLady Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 Ranster, I know that Sarah used it to save James.....I was just using that as a "for instance". Because if you win the POV you are safe, and also if the person that wins it decides to use it on someone, they are also safe from eviction. I guess I'm not doing to good of a job expressing what I'm trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ranster627 Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 my bad, Bama ... I read it too quickly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catniptoy Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 It's a good question, because this year it really could happen! Since there are partners this year, I could envision perhaps Sarah and James being on the block, Sarah winning the POV and choosing to take James off the block instead of herself. In that instance, Sarah would have to stay on the block and the HOH would then nominate another hamster to go up in James' place. That would be a BB first!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts