margreek Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Hello, just a few questions about past editions of BB I was wondering about. 1. When did they start sequestering the jury? 2. When did they introduce the POV? Thanks
Moksha Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 1. Season 2 I think. It was so long ago, it's hard to remember if they had sequester in season 2, but surely they did? 2. Season 3.
King123 Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Yeah, but the veto wasnt Golden, if they saved somebody they could be put up in there place.. thats cant happen with the golden veto
margreek Posted August 9, 2006 Author Posted August 9, 2006 Did they have sequester in season 2? I do recall almost all the evicted HG's being part of the jury.
King123 Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 i think everybody went back into the house and voted for final 2... i could be wrong, but i think i remember seeing everybody in the house on last episode.
word_girl Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Sequester started season 4; POV started very end of season 3.
*Sunshine* Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Word Girl is correct. They introduced the jury of 7 in BB4 and sequestered the jury in that show. On BB5, they reduced the number of HGs playing for veto to six (HOH, two nominees and each chose another HG to play for them).
Tarman12 Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 I think she's correct. I remember in BB3, the main reason Danielle lost was because the voting houseguests had seen her trashing all of them in her DR sessions.
lovely Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Actually in Season 2 there were seven people on the jury since the final vote was 5-2.
fromthedamage Posted August 9, 2006 Posted August 9, 2006 Actually in Season 2 there were seven people on the jury since the final vote was 5-2. Justin wasn't brought back for the vote, so that brought it down to nine and then Will and Nicole each got to eliminate one vote.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.