Hikiki

Oh, and I’m also not a fan. She’s too full of her princess self for my taste

The glare she gave Kaitlyn as the votes were read was hysterical. It was bitter at the very least and extreme dislike to put it nicely 

3 hours ago, omahaguy said:

 

If she is voted out tonight, I predict (actually I'm have a vision) that the "chance to come back" will be to solve a Survivor style jigsaw puzzle of the BB logo with only 2 pieces. ....I'm sure production wants her in the house for our entertainment pleasure.  

 

Close, but she still got too flustered to pull it off 

Im so curious what Fessy took off his mike to tell Tyler 

Fessy must have some serious pheromones, because I’m not seeing whatever all these girls see

I like her too but think she made a mistake when she told JC she didn’t expect to have so many people she felt protective of in this game. She said she expected to have one or two, not six. Should she be trying to make him and the rest of the people she’s playing with feel like she’s more protective of them then other people. It’s a small critique but just something that stood out for me on After Dark

I like Sam but will agree with Rockstar, who I don’t like, that Sam’s reasoning for initially putting up Haleigh and Kaitlyn was the opposite of female empowerment. Men are fully capable of standing up for themselves and don’t need us to ‘protect’ them from female sexuality that may bend men to our wills and needs. Of course, there are always exceptions, but that’s something way beyond what we’ve seen this season. We also don’t need to start belittling other women etc.

that being said, I don’t care if either Rockstar or Kaitlyn go home so I’m going to give her a pass.

I also dont think she’s playing a smart game, and that’s she probably isn’t much of a game player outside of the house. Hopefully, that won’t hurt her, because despite what I’ve said, I just like her.

On 7/24/2018 at 3:39 PM, BBLover4ever said:

Not liking how he is trying to control Haleigh's actions in the house with the other men. I like how she is just not having it.

That was great. He sounds like he’d be a suffocating showmance or boyfriend outside of the house

I can’t stand when houseguests use financial need as a decision to stay longer. Jury gets more money etc. Big Brother is a game. It’s not about winning not what players ‘need’. That would work against her in my book. 

4 hours ago, jersey721 said:

Wow, the power has really gone to her head.  Welcome to Big Brother Facism week.

fascism? How do you figure? She’s keeping her room and choices to herself. She’s not dictating what everyone can and can’t  do in the house

1 hour ago, pfeifchris77 said:

No not at all. Sam is Sam. Good ole country girl. She just requested that being HOH now she didn’t want people in her room and hiding from others for one on one conversations and game talk. She’s cool with people hanging out to just chit chat with her :-) HTH 

I thought that was kind of smart. Lately, the HoH room seems to be just another room in the house instead of the HoH using it to their advantage. I don’t think two people should be talking game without the HoH up there. No way. That can work against you

Boring so far

Her face reminds me of Nicole Richie’s

Shes crazy. I don’t believe she’s clairvoyant, and I believe in some of that stuff. It hardy takes rocket science or mysticism to know the bros were going to throw her under the bus. She the obvious choice and they had to throw someone

I like her so far

She choose to leave her children on their birthday etc. to play this game. The fact she left her children was her choice. If Brett wants to play the game by throwing her under the bus, it has nothing to do with her daughter’s birthday.

She just came across as crazy. 

Classless exit. They had to vote off one of their own. What did he expect?

She’s crazy. I love how Tyler’s side of the house exploited it

She annoys me, especially in cases like she constantly told Faysal she’s ‘proud’ of him for winning veto. She barely even knows him. I’ve noticed she tries to act like she has other people’s best interests at heart, when she really is just playing a game. The pretense bothers me

She was hilarious in the jury house.

41 minutes ago, JessicaRocks said:

 

I've watched every season.  Several times, people have broken the have-not rules - but they were always isolated incidents where a houseguest ate real food one time (and they usually tried to avoid getting caught).  There have also been cases where people took maybe ONE hot shower on purpose or by accident.

 

Matt is absolutely the FIRST houseguest in the history of BB to ignore EACH AND EVERY ONE of the have-not rules from beginning to end EACH AND EVERY TIME...even to the point of being downright rude about it (in most cases, when they tried to get him to follow the rules, he either literally or figuratively told them to f**k off).  He never took ONE cold shower, never ate ONE BITE of slop, never slept for ONE minute in have-not bed or have-not room (at least he did not follow any of the rules during THIS particular Have-Not assignment).  And all he got was ONE penalty vote which BB and everyone in the world knew that he wanted.

 

I'm saying Matt is a trailblazer for this issue because he IS!  He is the first houseguest to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that NONE of have-not rules have to be followed even ONE time, because the only penalty will be ONE penalty eviction vote (which in most cases, means nothing, especially if you are part of the alliance in control of the house at the time).  If I were a houseguest on BB now, I would never follow the have-not rules...one penalty vote is nothing compared to a week of cold showers, slop and have-not beds!

Oh goodness, that was a lot to express one idea. I guess I'd hesitate to call Matt a trailblazer. It seems to give him too much credit. And house guests have flagrantly ignored the rules in the past and received the same penalty. 

This feels like you were practically yelling at me. I've watched every season too, but I can't say I remember every detail nor would I want to

13 hours ago, JessicaRocks said:

Well, Matt has officially become a trailblazer - he did not follow ANY of the have-not rules for even ONE minute all week...and received (drum roll please): ONE penalty vote!  So from now on, ANY house guest who EVER follows the have-not rules for even ONE minute is a total FOOL...ONE penalty vote is nothing compared to a week of slop, cold showers and sleeping in have-not room in a have-not bed.  BB might as well just stop having have-nots...it's all over!  (And BB didn't even show one instance of his flaunting of the rules, which he mostly did in a very disrespectful manner!)

 

Matt should have been kicked out of the entire game for his malicious, wanton and purposeful flaunting of the have-not rules ALL week...ignoring all of them on DOZENS of occasions!

I don't think he was the first. I do think BB needs to change the penalties though to something more severe like effecting their stipend. 

5 minutes ago, Newby said:

Am I the only one who thinks the "tear up the house" game is really stupid?  What is the purpose of this game?  I'm with Kevin on this one.  There was no reason to destroy other people's clothes and belongings.  In other years they have dumped boxes of cereal and flour and sugar in the floors.  Actually I didn't see food being thrown in the floor this time.  Did I miss it or do you think production told them not to do that because of the ant and rat problems?

Could be (about the ant & rat problem). I actually think tearing up the house makes it harder to find things, which maybe the motivation for some of them, but then it's also harder for you. 

Maybe its BBs way of getting them to actually clean??

3 hours ago, Lamasquerade said:

I see your point, but I didn't see enough of him to form an opinion about him. Can't call someone a favorite if I didn't see how they act in the house and how they play the game. 

But you can't hate them either so it would work for me

25 minutes ago, Roli said:

 

Kevin washed the towels.  

 

Why does everyone smell the towels before using them?  

The towel issue would bother me. I'd have to keep my towels separate. There are dirty towels everywhere so I'd find it hard to trust that the clean towels were clean. 

9 hours ago, HeleneL said:

Huh? Jason promised nothing to Maven.  They just misinterpreted what he said.  Matt is just a floater and only wants his Wheaties and a good lay with Raven.  He's useless as tits on a bull. 

They also listened to Paul and didn't ask the HoH themselves. These people take what Paul says as law and they couldn't even remember if Jason said it or not.

38 minutes ago, Lamasquerade said:

I figured out he wears the bird just so he can be underestimated..looks like a doofus but in reality he is ruling the roost!

I thought something similar last year too. He used Pablo to get them to underestimate him.