Olliedog Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Do you want AP in BB9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendes56 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not the way it was played this time! I'd like America to vote on eviction but not have someone work for the nomination. I'd rather it was a rotating position rather than one player throughout. I don't think they could do it again the same way because the other players would know something was up and try to get rid of them early, if they were smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
echo Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 It would be interesting next year only in that they'd know that one of them is a Mole, so HGs would be trying to figure out who that was. Overall, I didn't find it added too much to the game, however it most definitely changed how Eric played the game. I do think D\ED would have been gone if not for the AP, America wanted them to stay in the game, so that helped them out of a couple of jams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GQtaste Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Hell no! I thought it was a disaster! The tasks were lame as hell. It wasn't fair to either AP or the other houseguest. Think about this: this clown made 40k and finished 5th. Second place gets 50k. Now does that sound fair to anybody? And there were inconsitenties. He didn't have a vote on who would get evicted, but when he won the veto that he could pick that himself. And I assume if he would have won an hoh he would have been able to pick that himself also. In short it was stupid and it won't be used again. Nice try for changing it up a bit but it ended up being not a good twist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrowhead Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Think about this: this clown made 40k and finished 5th. Second place gets 50k Second place has to deduct their weekly stipend from the amount too as well as the 1st place winner. I bet Eric does not deduct his stipend from the AP challenges so he gets to add that on as well. Not bad for 5 th place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TCS Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Heck NO!!!! Lame...Lame...Lame... JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sara5229 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I hope they don't. If they want America's input they should just take our vote to go with the rest. AP was a mess and it wasn't fair to anyone in the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeCiMom Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cocoabutta98 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 No I would not like to see AP in BB9 However I think Eric did a kickass job at working for America even tho I don't really care too much for the little weasel ... LOL I don't know it was just something about the way Eric talked and looked that creeped me out ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis_3 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Only if the voting public was the player. no secret meetings in the DR. Just America* gets a vote (combine Season 1 with the current game). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpawz Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 ah you know what scrap the crap, just let them play and do away with AP. It only gives Eric an excuse for the rest of his life. And you can be sure everyone is going to hear about it over and over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynKel Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 No more AP, but it would be fun if America got a vote either every week, or at least in the F2. I actually missed being able to vote for America's Choice. It's amusing when people think they are loved by the public, and then don't get picked to win anything by America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyBlues Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I'd be up for America being AP. Let them all assume that the jury house will have 7, when in fact there'd only be 6, with America's vote being the 7th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 And you can be sure everyone is going to hear about it over and over You got that right Bearpawz The one and only.....Mr. LOGORRHEA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xal Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Absolutely, positively not. America should never have a vote in who gets evicted because it's not fair that "favorites" of people not even playing the game get an outside advantage. Period. No matter what, this is still a game with a lot of money involved so outside influences should have no effect on the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis_3 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Maybe America* can decide who gets into the house. Have BB select 100 people, they post a small YouTube-type interview, post their bios, and we can vote on the people in the house. Hell, that way we may get more than 13 20-somethings, a token gay guy, token black person and one old guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeepGirl Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Think about this: this clown made 40k and finished 5th. Second place gets 50k Second place has to deduct their weekly stipend from the amount too as well as the 1st place winner. I bet Eric does not deduct his stipend from the AP challenges so he gets to add that on as well. Not bad for 5 th place. I was thinking about that too. If he gets to keep his stipend as well as the 40K, he finishes only $1000 short of second place. I'd call that third place not fifth, regardless of when he was evicted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackcat3 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not at all!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodh Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I'm all with America having a Vote...with no player attached to it...but there again, you have the capability of Producer manipulation and no accountability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laladoopiedu Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 I think it'd be very hard to do an AP again. Most future players would have seen this season, and any suspicious behavior could lead them to believe that that player is an AP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJSingleton Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 NO! AP was a good idea and I'm glad they tried it, but it was like putting Eric in a marathon and breaking his legs. He had to do some fast talking and lots of lying to get as far as he did. I respected him (except for his foul mouth and occasional meanness). The game would have been far different if he'd been able to play for himself. But hey...he got money and that's cool for him. I think I would have enjoy AP more if a nasty character like Dick was doing it. Then I wouldn't care if he had a tough time. I think CBS needs to add more interesting activities for the houseguests, especially after hours for Showtime and online feeds. A little creativity could really spice up the conversations. Even if they played a simple game of Scruples. Or what if they were challenged to find hidden clues in the house that would result in rewards? The silly challenges Eric received were insults to fans, except maybe the one about starting a "catch phrase" -- that was kind of creative. I'd give a dollar for CBS to really show some creativity, give us more likeable houseguests with depth and intelligence and to spice up the day-by-day moments in the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUMA Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 NO. I think it's unfair to the player because he/she could not play their own game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polodar Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 There is no reason to repeat a season's "twist" there are plenty of good ideas that havent been used. It will still be interesting to see future paranoid house guests wonder if someone could be "America's Choice". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarheeltitan Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 no, no, no. Please not another AP, it was a crappy twist, and like its been said why repeat one It just wasn't fun to watch someone who could be a strong player if left to himself (he threw all the early HoH's when he had a chance to win) have to change his strategy on a weekly basis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephvig Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 No way, I'd rather it be like season 1 where we get to vote who leaves!!!! We could get rid of the floaters and the people who aren't playing the game at all..to make things more interesting!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.