samg Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Are they going to put two extra players into sequester house (they wouldn't put 1 - that could produce a tie vote)? I've read in livefeed posts that the players say first 5 evictions go home, sequester starts with the 6th. If that's true and there were only 12 HG's to start with, there's be only 5 in sequester. It seems to me that in past seasns the final jury has ben 7 (anyone confirm?) If so does that mean that CBS planned on 14 from the start? (Can domeone check the anounced schedule against the number of HG's and reach a conclusion?) If so, I'd like to read the exact words Julie said when announcing that there'd be 2 extra HG's. (What this is about is a "CBS leak" of the POTENTIAL guests season-by-season with comments next to most of them, released weeks before the "official" 20 were announced and a thread ons everal sites claiming that at least some of the HG's were "in" from the start, regardless of the Viewer Vote.) Oh - and if there is NOT enough time left to evict 10 more, then when do you think the double eviction week will occur? (My guess, assuming that the first HG to go to sequester in the 6th eviction, is that it will either be week 4 (w/ evictions 4 & 5) or week 6 (with evictions 6 & 7). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNunOwnedGoat Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Generally (always - I think), there are seven jury members. Also -- I think the fourteen HouseGuests was planned from the start. I think there have always been fourteen spots on the memory wall. So CBS has to have something planned out to get them all out of there in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samg Posted July 26, 2006 Author Share Posted July 26, 2006 But I believe it was originally announced there would be only 12 (I figured it was because it wsa "All Stars"): remember the "who made it?" show where all 20 were there and Julie caled the names? I believe that after 12 she said something about a "surprise" and that 2 more were going to be put in. Am I remembering something that didn't happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElisabethF50 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Julie SAID it was because America voted so close or something, and they put 2 extra America's Choice in there, but there was already 14 spots on the memory wall so they had it planned from the begining, they just didn't tell us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samg Posted July 26, 2006 Author Share Posted July 26, 2006 The memory wall isn't proof, because they certainly had time before the announcement show to add 2 more. But I think telling us that we could PAY to vote, then putting in people who were not voted in, would be walking a narrow legal path (on one side of which is "fraud"), which is why I was interested in Julie's words (and even in the language used when telling viewers they could vote.) Speaking of fraud: I'm pretty sure that the reason they showed FotH and now flames is because both of those are "in the house," and the sign-up for "live feeds" promises "24/7" connection to the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cktb2793 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 They are full of it....the ALWAYS planned to put 14 people in the house. There's been 14 people for the last couple years......that's why we ALWAYS have double eviction weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samg Posted July 26, 2006 Author Share Posted July 26, 2006 Mike just quoted the BB7 promo: 20 HG's, 12 keys, one prize 9words might be inaccurate, numbers are correct.) So were WERE told "12 keys"! Anyone able to reference the language used to induce viewers to make text votes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNunOwnedGoat Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 As previously stated, we were originally told that there would be twelve HouseGuest going in. Julie Chen then announced a "twist," stating that there would be fourteen HouseGuests entering the house. There were fourteen spaces on the memory wall, before they supossedly decided to add an extra two HouseGuests, meaning they probably planned on having 14 HouseGuests all along. But I think telling us that we could PAY to vote, then putting in people who were not voted in, would be walking a narrow legal path (on one side of which is "fraud"), which is why I was interested in Julie's words (and even in the language used when telling viewers they could vote.) When Julie announced the twenty, she said the top three men and the top three females would enter the house, then six extras of the producer's choice. They've always said that, meaning viewers always knew that some of them would enter the house that were not voted for America. Plus, you didn't have to PAY to vote. You could have logged on to CBS.com and voted for free. Speaking of fraud: I'm pretty sure that the reason they showed FotH and now flames is because both of those are "in the house," and the sign-up for "live feeds" promises "24/7" connection to the house. I doubt it, because when you signed up for the live feeds you agreed that the feeds would be blocked out. They're already covered legally, so there would be no reason to stay "in the house." See for yourself... http://real.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/real.cfg/...amp;p_topview=1 They even show a screenshot of the agreement that you agreed to when you signed up, where it says that the feeds will be blocked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deedsy Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 if there are 14 and the first 5 go home then yes there are 7 in sequester. The sovs are now guarnteed at least 2 in sequester now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depeche221 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Sam, why do I get the feeling that you have a hankerin to sue someone LOL Dep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fizzle Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 dep if it was that easy, i would be sueing for being so tramatized from boogie and his nasty comments about janelle and peeing in howies apple juice bottle. very very disturbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajunboiler Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 There should only be one double eviction week this year. The only reason they had two last year was because they brought Kaysar back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WannaBeBB9 Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 If I am remembering right, last year the first double eviction was the week where the first person went home and the second was the first in sequester house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajunboiler Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Yep, (thank God Jennifer went soon after that) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sassy Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 So, with all of the wackiness and the events that normally are spread throughout the week happening in a much shorter span this time, could this be a double eviction week?????? (Sorry if this has been brought up somewhere else.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fizzle Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 sassy... my sister called me this morning thinking the same thing. since julie said it would be a week of comps... and the way they are moving fast on everything... it very well could be a double eviction week. leave it to janie to win hoh on a double eviction week like she did last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajunboiler Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 At least she's had it for more than one day this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uvp Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 we need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sassy Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 I sure hope so too! If so, it's gonna get gooooooood! No matter who wins the next HOH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeCiMom Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 I was thinking the same this morning when I woke up too. But, if it is a double eviction week and they do the POV ceremony today and evict tomorrow... that will mean no feeds until next Thurs... right??? We won't know who's hoh, noms, pov until the next live show... am I off in this thinking or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
April Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 nope... I think you're right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sassy Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anjel Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 WHen it's a double eviction dont' they have the live eviction thursday, along with an HOH compeition & then the HOH annouces the nominations? Then they have POV, eviction & OH compeition the next show (sunday) & then veto tues & eviction on thursday again? That's how I thought it happened last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarman12 Posted July 29, 2006 Share Posted July 29, 2006 They could catch us up on everything tomorrow, have a live show on Tuesday with the eviction and the HOH competition, then have the new HOH make her nominations on-the-spot like they did last year with Janelle. Then race through everyrhing a second time and have another live show on Thursday with another eviction and HOH. On Thursday Julie said it was gonna be a week of competitions. And all that in a week when they have those messages blaring every 15 minutes. That means they'll be sleeping a lot during the day and the feeds will be as dull as dirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.