cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Why doesn't one or both of them approach Kaysar and tell him they will both back him or them by not voting against them if they ask Erika to take one of them off the block and put up Jase or Will? Isn't that what your supposed to do in this game? Make deals try to save yourself? Do they think they are too good to go to Kaysar and beg for their life? That's the game isn't it?
fizzle Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 yeah, it really is sad to see them up there boohoooing about the comp. half of comps if not most are luck. but they make it so personal.. like bb did this on purpose so they couldnt win. they look pretty pathetic
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 Everyone here is saying so and the live feeds are reporting that yes
carmen Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Okay, thanks. Wow, this is really going to put Erika in a sticky position.
littlelulu Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Here we go again. It's not fair, BB didn't want me to win boo flipping hoo.
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 I thought I heard them say they hope they don't do that again and why
bigbrosister Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 that would be funny if erika used to veto and then kaysar put erika up in place. but the guys wouldn't vote erika out since she's dated booger. i think the house will keep nakomis because each team knows that she can make a deal and stick with it more than diane the dunce. who knows though.
nebartist Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 *****EDITED TO REMOVE QUOTE************ if she uses it she cant go up
fizzle Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 they were not talking about bring someone back as if it was fact. they were thinking that bb might do that and they talked about why they think that. they have no idea if they are doing it or not.
bigbrosister Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 if they brought allison back in the house, i swear to God i'll stop watching the show and feed updates.
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 that would be funny if erika used to veto and then kaysar put erika up in place I don't think the veto winner even if they use the veto to remove someone can go up themselves or am I wrong?
cujokay Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 I agree that more players will enter the house. I don't believe it will be someone voted out as in past years. I believe it will be a player or players that were not originally in the house. BB will add a clause that they can't be voted out immediately, and it will change the face of the game. PLEASE, let me be right. I would love it! Think how the hampsters would scramble.
bigbrosister Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 yes. if erika chose not to use the veto then she is safe and the people on the block are not. if she used the veto save either nak or diane, then kaysar has to put someone else up on the block to take that person's place. he can replace that spot with erika/the veto winner. i dont think she'll do that though, i bet she will leave it as it is with nak and diane being up on the block.
jcy808 Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 they said they didn't want to campaign against each other. once again making things personal instead of playing the game. i think nakomis knows she's the target between the two of them. she's a straight-shooter, so i don't think she'd campaign against diane. who knows, though, it's a long time until eviction night. we'll see what happens.
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 bigbrosister are you sure? If Erika uses the veto to remove someone she can then go up? I thought she couldn't. Others have said that isn't the case.
uvp Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 couple question what kind of comp was it? how the hell did the leech ericka win?
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 So wouldn't it make sense for one or both of them to actually play the game and try to save themselves by making a deal? Instead of sitting around moaning that no one is talking game to them why don't they approach someone themselves and play the game? Now I really want both of these players to go they don't even play the game.
uvp Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 because it is useless to beg when the folks you are begging to are set in their ways
cindyannie Posted July 15, 2006 Author Posted July 15, 2006 Maybe but how do they know what they will say if they don't try? That's the game!
wolverine43 Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 uvpnolimits Posted Today, 05:34 PM because it is useless to beg when the folks you are begging to are set in their ways ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That's as good an answer as I've read.
A_BB_Aholic Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Its the golden power of veto...if you use it on someone else, you are safe too.
uvp Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 almost like ali begging it was so pointless. the reason your are nominated is because the line in the sand has been drawn
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.