Russell Hantz suspected of revealing spoilers
#1
Posted 01 February 2011 - 01:00 PM
http://www.thedailyb...-as-his-source/
Fan spoiler being sued by CBS and Mark Burnett is naming Russell as his source... interesting read
#2
Posted 18 February 2011 - 03:23 PM
#3
Posted 18 February 2011 - 04:05 PM
#4
Posted 19 February 2011 - 03:32 AM
Also, hasn't there been leaks for many years. Its my impression that its pretty easy to find out who won before the start of each season, but only if a person searches on the internet; major news sources don't ruin it for everyone by announcing the winner even if they can verify it. I have watched every season since season 1 and never once have known who won before it was revealed on the show, so I find it pretty easy to avoid finding out; simply don't search for survivor leaks.
#5
Posted 19 February 2011 - 09:53 AM
#6
Posted 20 February 2011 - 10:37 PM
If it is true, pretty good chance Hantz won't be at the season final live reunion show. Kind of doubt if they are suing him for 5 million, that they would be on good terms about him having any further involvement with Survivor.
#7
Posted 21 February 2011 - 11:31 AM
I predict CBS won't touch Russell. They need him for future shows. Besides, Russell would fight this, and CBS would never win in court. Just because there's a "don't tell" clause in the contract, doesn't make it legal. It's just there to scare contestants, but CBS won't try to enforce it because if it's declared invalid then they have nothing left to scare people with.
#8
Posted 21 February 2011 - 12:31 PM
Canopus, on 21 February 2011 - 11:31 AM, said:
I predict CBS won't touch Russell. They need him for future shows. Besides, Russell would fight this, and CBS would never win in court. Just because there's a "don't tell" clause in the contract, doesn't make it legal. It's just there to scare contestants, but CBS won't try to enforce it because if it's declared invalid then they have nothing left to scare people with.
I totally disagree with your post. But everyone has the right to a opinion.
#9
Posted 21 February 2011 - 01:10 PM
gizzmotor, on 21 February 2011 - 12:31 PM, said:
Even when that opinion is totally and completely wrong
Thing is, IF, and it's a big IF, CBS decides to pursue going after Russell for this, it won't be until this season is over.... then we'll see
Dang I just had a terrible thought, I might have to watch the Survivor finale from my room on my Disney Cruise....or I might miss it altogether.... EEK!!!!!!
#11
Posted 22 February 2011 - 09:53 PM
gizzmotor, on 22 February 2011 - 02:53 PM, said:
No actually I was agreeing with you, you said that people have a right to their opinion and i agreed that they were even when they were completely wrong
#12
Posted 23 February 2011 - 08:03 AM
Ladies, ladies, ladies .........
Sheesh - did you see the video Dade posted in Survivor Redemption Island Media thread ?
Russell says right out that he did NOT leak anything.
BUT - then - I recall some presidents have even lied
Wonder if we'll ever find out if he was the one.... ????
#13
Posted 23 February 2011 - 08:22 AM
#14
Posted 23 February 2011 - 12:49 PM
#15
Posted 25 February 2011 - 07:03 AM
Here's a crazy thought... if Jeff leaves after this season, what about Russell taking over as the show's host? It might not work, but crazier things have happened! I, for one, would love it! Russell could point out all the dumb moves people are making, with the full knowledge of what's really going on. He'd make a more active host, which might be a refreshing change for a reality show.
#16
Posted 25 February 2011 - 09:04 AM
He gets under my skin so quickly. I wouldnt care if I ever saw him on survivor or any other show myself.
#17
Posted 25 February 2011 - 09:36 AM
#18
Posted 25 February 2011 - 09:52 AM
#19
Posted 25 February 2011 - 11:09 AM
#20
Posted 25 February 2011 - 04:24 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












