Jump to content

Primary: Sky Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Secondary: Sky Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Pattern: Blank Waves Squares Notes Sharp Wood Rockface Leather Honey Vertical Triangles
Welcome to TV Fan Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Subscribe to the Big Brother Live Feeds
Photo

BB15 The Jury Discussion


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1
laladoopiedu

laladoopiedu

    Live Feed Updater

  • Moderator
  • 6,178 posts

So, does it seem that Julie hinted that a jury member may be going back into the house at some point?  I can't believe this would even be a possibility after the bad reviews BB Canada received for doing this.



#2
uvp

uvp

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 19,890 posts

that was my fear bb would mimic bbcanada

 

 

i hate when they bring evicted players :animated_bouncy:



#3
laladoopiedu

laladoopiedu

    Live Feed Updater

  • Moderator
  • 6,178 posts

And not just an evicted player, but an evicted player who's sequestered with other players and can talk about anything.  That's a huge advantage.



#4
Hawknose

Hawknose

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1,708 posts

And not just an evicted player, but an evicted player who's sequestered with other players and can talk about anything.  That's a huge advantage.

They hinted at it, but they didn't tell the evicted HG's about it so I don't know - if they do it like Canada did it I swear I won't watch the rest of the season - the only way to do it right is the way they did in season 9 where they were all sequestered separately



#5
Slimcruz

Slimcruz

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 7,847 posts

She did hint at something.  It seemed that she hinted more pointedly to candice and didn't elaborate after that.


How did canada do it?



#6
Hawknose

Hawknose

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1,708 posts

She did hint at something.  It seemed that she hinted more pointedly to candice and didn't elaborate after that.


How did canada do it?

It was awful - each evicted HG went to the jury house and reported everything to the other evicted HG's - then Canada voted one back in to the house with all the previously evicted HG's knowledge of events - it was a huge unfair advantage - in other words they were all sequestered together



#7
Shrinra

Shrinra

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 299 posts

Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle, then when there were five people left Canada voted one person back into the game. He had a chance to get information and solidify bonds with the jury members which helped him. He also manipulated HG's by telling them that they were loved in the jury and would win. He would have won too, if Topaz hadn't voted for the wrong person to win (still laughing about that btw). 



#8
AntiBrenchelArmy

AntiBrenchelArmy

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 95 posts

Bringing players back before jury starts is always more exciting :)

 

Although I hated that the last time it was done (because Brendon came back), it was worth it when Lawon threw himself out of the game so early XD



#9
Hawknose

Hawknose

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1,708 posts

Bringing players back before jury starts is always more exciting :)

 

Although I hated that the last time it was done (because Brendon came back), it was worth it when Lawon threw himself out of the game so early XD

Lol I'll never forget how he thought he was getting super powers I still laugh every time I hear his name :)



#10
Slimcruz

Slimcruz

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 7,847 posts

Okay.  Thanks all.  I remember reading that there was some controversy over the BB canada winner.  Now I understand.  I kind of thought when julie chen said it to candice tonight that candice was a bit taken aback for a moment. 



#11
gerberadaisy7

gerberadaisy7

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 331 posts

It was awful - each evicted HG went to the jury house and reported everything to the other evicted HG's - then Canada voted one back in to the house with all the previously evicted HG's knowledge of events - it was a huge unfair advantage - in other words they were all sequestered together

Yes this is exactly what happened.  The returning HG played it up - lying of course - and completly affected the game.  He almost won too...



#12
gerberadaisy7

gerberadaisy7

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 331 posts

Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle, then when there were five people left Canada voted one person back into the game. He had a chance to get information and solidify bonds with the jury members which helped him. He also manipulated HG's by telling them that they were loved in the jury and would win. He would have won too, if Topaz hadn't voted for the wrong person to win (still laughing about that btw). 

This makes it sound like everyone evicted went and hung out.  No, there was a sequestered jury, just like BBUS.  There was a select jury of 7 and he got voted back in (the choice was other evicted HG's of the jury - like the US show - he was the clear fan favourite and the only reason this was even happening!)

 

He was fairly evicted.  OMG!



#13
Shrinra

Shrinra

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 299 posts

This makes it sound like everyone evicted went and hung out.  No, there was a sequestered jury, just like BBUS.  There was a select jury of 7 and he got voted back in (the choice was other evicted HG's of the jury - like the US show - he was the clear fan favourite and the only reason this was even happening!)

 

He was fairly evicted.  OMG!

 

 

Yes, I am well aware of all of this and I thought I made it clear in my post that all of the evicted HG's went to the jury house and mingled with one another. They DID go and hang out...the jury members in the jury house that is. I never said it wasn't sequestered. I don't see how I was misleading.



#14
gerberadaisy7

gerberadaisy7

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 331 posts

 

Yes, I am well aware of all of this and I thought I made it clear in my post that all of the evicted HG's went to the jury house and mingled with one another. They DID go and hang out...the jury members in the jury house that is. I never said it wasn't sequestered. I don't see how I was misleading.

"Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle"

 

That was a tad misleading to me.  I was going to explain myself, but actually, the sentence doesn't make sense.

 

I guess all of the evicted HG's got to mingle with each other and be jury?



#15
nyse

nyse

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 636 posts

I kinda want them to compare notes about folks still in the house then allowed back in, however I would like them to compete for the 2nd chance. Please keep America out of this.



#16
Shrinra

Shrinra

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 299 posts

"Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to jury and mingle"

 

That was a tad misleading to me.  I was going to explain myself, but actually, the sentence doesn't make sense.

 

I guess all of the evicted HG's got to mingle with each other and be jury?

 

Uh...yes. BB Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to the jury house and mingle, meaning swap information and gain information they otherwise wouldn't have known (if they had been sequestered away from one another). So I meant it was unfair. If they were going to bring back a jury member they should have sequestered them all separately. That's what I was trying to explain. I still don't see how I was misleading. I'm sorry if I was though.



#17
gerberadaisy7

gerberadaisy7

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 331 posts

 

Uh...yes. BB Canada let all of the evicted HG's go to the jury house and mingle, meaning swap information and gain information they otherwise wouldn't have known (if they had been sequestered away from one another). So I meant it was unfair. If they were going to bring back a jury member they should have sequestered them all separately. That's what I was trying to explain. I still don't see how I was misleading. I'm sorry if I was though.

You rock. I SUCK.



#18
Roli

Roli

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 327 posts

I just wonder if Candice and Ginamarie will actually come to blows when Ginamarie gets to the jury house. They should really be kept separated. The hatred between them is just too strong.



#19
Drummer1

Drummer1

    Live Feed Updater

  • LFU
  • 235 posts

Julie Chen kept saying over and over that since they are now going to jury that she would not be able to talk to the houseguests about all of the media attention that they have received regarding racism and child pornography.  That means that they are going to be bombarded with this for the first time in the interview line in the backyard on finale night.

 

Do you think that they will limit who gets in from the press to question them?



#20
Janis

Janis

    Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 890 posts
 

Julie Chen kept saying over and over that since they are now going to jury that she would not be able to talk to the houseguests about all of the media attention that they have received regarding racism and child pornography.  That means that they are going to be bombarded with this for the first time in the interview line in the backyard on finale night.
 
Do you think that they will limit who gets in from the press to question them?

 In my opinion they never ask the houseguests anything relevent. They are always sugar coated. I will bet that Aaryn, Spencer, Gina Marie and Amanda will be notified about the situation before they are even interviewed. I would not be surprised if they did not do any interviews, Aaryn's pr person I am sure will not want her opening her mouth.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users