New Zach Interview
Posted 04 November 2007 - 02:38 PM
I can't for the life of me find the intervies Zach said he was doing this weekned. If anyone can find them can you post them. I would love to see them.
BlogTalkRadio.com Radio Interview Nov 3rd with Kendrid
Interview on radio show Chillin' With Scooby with Kendrid aka Scooby! check it out @ www.blogtalkradio.com/SCOOBY check me out with dolphincrash.com itll be fun
nov 4th sunday 2pm radio interview www.belowthebelt.com
I will be doing a radio interview at 2pm for www.belowthebelt.com. check it out, it will feature dolphincrash.com and bb8 material
Posted 04 November 2007 - 04:16 PM
Posted 04 November 2007 - 07:07 PM
Wow, I wouldn't pay $2000.00 for an old shirt of Nick's that Dani wore on the show, either -- but apparently someone did.
Posted 04 November 2007 - 09:49 PM
Posted 05 November 2007 - 07:59 AM
I don't believe I said *I* was buying anything. I just pointed out that a) it was a limited edition of 50 (increasing the value), and if someone is willing to pay two grand for an old shirt because it was worn by a hg on a tv show (how nuts is that?), then Zach may very well sell his prints.
And that's fine that you wouldn't spend the money on them, ranjake -- I wouldn't spend that kind of money on reality tv paraphernalia either -- t-shirts, prints, or otherwise. My point was, there are people who will -- and do.
Posted 05 November 2007 - 09:07 AM
Posted 05 November 2007 - 06:55 PM
Posted 05 November 2007 - 07:12 PM
I think it is wrong to judge anyone as to whether or not they are an artist. It's such a subjective thing. He has a passion for photography -- he said so in interviews. So, if he is creative and uses photography to express that creativity, he is an artist. He may not be a good or great artist, but I do think he is expressing himself with art. Even Nick, with his glue and glitter, could be considered an artist by some. Personally, I would consider his work to be more of a crafts hobby, but if Nick wanted to call himself an artist, then I wouldn't disagree with him. I think it all depends on the creativity used and the passion behind the work.
Edited to add: I should have quoted -- I wasn't directing this post to you in any way, Ranjake. I was responding to Fatcat's above quote.
Posted 05 November 2007 - 09:42 PM
Posted 06 November 2007 - 09:36 AM
there are actually people out there that fling sh*t (yes actual human waste and animal waste) on wall and call it art. and while others might gawk and think its nothing but crap (i made a funny) others will stare at it and see themselves in it. crazy but true.
as for zack and his pics... ehhhh.. ive seen the same kinda thing at the dollar store. and whats with the boy in the sand? he isnt in the sand, he is in the water!! oopsy.
Posted 06 November 2007 - 10:41 AM
I made my statement not as an absolute end all statement that ZACH IS NOT AN ARTISTE, Rather in my opinion Zach is not an artist and I have every right to not just think it but say it, nor does my opinion have to affect you in any way.
I have passion for a lot of things myself, so I understand why Zach would want to put his stuff out there as an expression, but no one least of all me said a darn thing about Zach, other than in my opinion.............you said it is wrong to JUDGE anyone, okay, I am not judging him, I was giving my opinion.
Posted 06 November 2007 - 04:42 PM
Posted 06 November 2007 - 06:12 PM
Posted 08 November 2007 - 01:14 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users